Comments on: Google Announces Chrome Browser http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/2008/09/02/google-announces-chrome/ Web solutions provider of web development, search engine marketing, and project authoring. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:29:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Chris Taylor http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/2008/09/02/google-announces-chrome/#comment-6 Chris Taylor Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:57:07 +0000 http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/?p=20#comment-6 I think Paul is referring to the terms and conditions which stated that Google had "a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through the new browser". Slightly worrying for freedom fans. However the terms have since been amended, plenty of news about that including from PC Advisor: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=103924 I think Paul is referring to the terms and conditions which stated that Google had “a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through the new browser”. Slightly worrying for freedom fans. However the terms have since been amended, plenty of news about that including from PC Advisor: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=103924

]]> By: Vincent http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/2008/09/02/google-announces-chrome/#comment-5 Vincent Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:46:05 +0000 http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/?p=20#comment-5 Yes it does seem very similar, it even ported (with my permission) my Firefox configs over. I saw your forum post, nothing is for free and no doubt this will include anotehr platform for their advertising and/or services. "should not be using this browser where the content is not for public consumption" Could you clarify this, not quite sure I understand you there? Yes it does seem very similar, it even ported (with my permission) my Firefox configs over. I saw your forum post, nothing is for free and no doubt this will include anotehr platform for their advertising and/or services.

“should not be using this browser where the content is not for public consumption”

Could you clarify this, not quite sure I understand you there?

]]> By: Paul http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/2008/09/02/google-announces-chrome/#comment-4 Paul Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:02:49 +0000 http://myjournal.com/sites/sonet-digital/blog/?p=20#comment-4 I gave it a try yesterday and I don't see what it's giving me that say Firefox doesn't. However there's some interesting clauses within their terms, I highlighted 11.2 at http://forums.tolranet.com/showthread.php?t=217 as to me it means we should not be using this browser where the content is not for public consumption. I gave it a try yesterday and I don’t see what it’s giving me that say Firefox doesn’t. However there’s some interesting clauses within their terms, I highlighted 11.2 at http://forums.tolranet.com/showthread.php?t=217 as to me it means we should not be using this browser where the content is not for public consumption.

]]>